October 25, 2016
Senior leaders of Sarawak BN parties back Chief Minister Adenan Satem's motion on Article 1(2) to be moved at the Sarawak Legislative Assembly.
KUCHING: Two Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders see the proposed motion in the Sarawak Assembly on Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution as a timely move.
“Malaysia was formed based on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and related constitutional documents. All parties must respect these documents,” said a PBB Supreme Council Member Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah.
He argued it would be wrong to take the position that constitutional documents on Malaysia were no longer relevant with the Federal Constitution in place, Free Malaysia Today reported - quoting The Borneo Post report.
The bottom line, he said, was that many of Sarawak’s rights (as those of Sabah) had been eroded over the years.
“This has to be corrected,” summed up Karim. “The proposed motion is the first step,” he was quoted as saying.
Two earlier motions, on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and oil and gas, were passed unanimously.
Sabah and Sarawak, before the amendment, were equal partners of Malaya in the Federation of Malaysia.
The Motion, Karim who is also state assistant minister of housing, said, was not only about MA63 but also the Inter-Governmental Committee Report (IGC) 1962/63 and the Cobbold Commission Report 1962, among others.
Meanwhile Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) President Tan Sri Datuk Amar James Masing said : “We cannot and shouldn’t take it anymore. With the tabling of the motion, it will ‘wake up’ Putrajaya to our rights.”
Sarawak, added Masing, had “enough” of being short-changed by Malaya over the last 53 years.
“The motion to reclaim Sarawak’s rights is timely,” said Masing, who is also deputy chief minister, according to a report in the Borneo Post.
There is a move by Sarawak leaders to restore Article 1(2) to its pre-13 July 1976 position, making Sarawak an equal partner in the federation and not just another state.
Both Masing and Abdul Karim were confident that the opposition would back the motion proposed by Chief Minister Adenan Satem. -@ybkarimsays